Reaction to "Morality and Religion"
One of the concepts Murdoch discusses in this excerpt, is that there can be no good behavior without the existence of evil. If the world evolved into this world where the only ideals of good moral behavior existed, evil would dissolve. However, if evil dissolves, so too dissolves good. If every man is good, being called good loses its meaning. Can such a world exist, or must there always be some balance struck for comparison. For example, in such a world would there be a distinction between people who are "less good" and "more good", or would such a distinction defeat the entire purpose of attaining such a world?
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
Previous Posts
- Reaction to "The Aim of Man" Aristotle discusses ...
- Reaction to "The Personal and Collective Unconscio...
- Tutoring Session Preview My partner and I had our...
- Reaction to "Brave New World" chapters 1 & 2 and t...
- Reaction to "Nonmoral Nature" The ichneumon fly w...
- Reaction to "Natural Selection" At this stage of ...
- Reaction to "Allegory of the Cave" "The Allegory ...
- Reaction to "The Four Idols" amongst all of his r...
- Reaction to "Thinking in Education" Two pieces of...
- Reaction to "Of the Education of Children" Montai...

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home